Trade-off between ease of use and cleverness of AI
Trade-off between ease of use and cleverness of AI
claude.icon
Things that are hard to use tend to be smart. It is human policy constraints that create the difficulty of use.
There are players with and without policy constraints, and the more constrained means are used because they are better. Sometimes, as a result of optimization within the constraints, a lesser performing one is chosen, but sometimes it is sufficient.
There are paid-for barriers, external cloud service use policy barriers, border barriers, and risk avoidance barriers.
When policy constraints result in poor performance using inferior systems, there can be a perception gap between the technology side and the demand side.
It would be a good idea to aim to lift policy constraints by avoiding them, achieving high performance, and visualizing the possibilities in the absence of constraints.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/AIの使いやすさと賢さのトレードオフ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.